Yes — tell developers and content to fix this. Different H1/banner with identical body and FAQ is not “harmless duplication.” Fix before production indexation. Synonym-level paraphrases of the same FAQ are not a strategy.
/teeth-in-a-day/ or keep the production-style services path)./{location}/{service}/ only for proven money intents with real local demand and unique assets (implants, emergency, Invisalign, Teeth-in-a-Day if uniquely staffed).| Do | Don’t |
|---|---|
| Unique title + meta per indexable URL | Identical “Service - Dental Team” titles |
| One location-qualified H1 | Two H1s (generic + location) |
| One office phone + booking CTA | Stacks of every office phone |
| Self-canonical to final host/path | Missing canonicals / -2 duplicate publishes |
| FAQ schema only for unique answers | Clone FAQ JSON across offices |
[location_phone], [location_booking_link], [location_content] in rendered HTML — URL evidence sheet (205).service_acf_content + service_faq into every location URL — shared CPT sheet./services/…, /florida/…, *-2) to one canonical per intent — duplicate roots sheet.Так, треба фіксити до запуску. Інший H1/банер недостатньо — основний текст і FAQ скопійовані між локаціями. Плюс на стейджі не підставляються [location_phone] / booking tokens і в CTA висять телефони кількох офісів. Або унікалізуємо money pages, або прибираємо матрицю location×service на користь hub + location pages.
Track execution on the action plan.